A comedic hero is the "king of heroes"—the most heroic figure, a hero among heroes. Only the literature that creates comedic heroes can be regarded as truly mature literature.
A comedic hero is the "king of heroes"—the most heroic figure, a hero among heroes. Only the literature that creates comedic heroes can be regarded as truly mature literature.
Whether a country’s literature is mature
depends on whether it has shaped "comedic heroes".
Heroes stand out among ordinary people and
symbolize maturity. For instance, a combat hero is a soldier who has mastered
the most sophisticated combat skills. Every profession has its own heroes, and
they are invariably the most outstanding individuals in that field. This is a
truth understood by all, so no further elaboration is needed. Therefore,
literature that portrays heroes can basically be considered mature.
However, just as lions are the royal family
of animals—and within a pride, there is still a "king of
lions"—heroes also fall into different tiers. Which type of hero is the
most mature, the "king among kings"? It is presumably none other than
the comedic hero. The reason is that heroic figures in serious dramas and
tragic heroes mostly follow established conventions, while comedic heroes are
those who take an unconventional path. We can gain a clear understanding of
this by analyzing the plot I discussed yesterday.
It was common for prisoners to be slapped
by prison guards. If a prisoner was intimidated, swallowed his grievances (even
metaphorically "swallowing broken teeth"), and resigned himself to a
submissive life ever after, he could not be called a hero. If he were a
unyielding heroic figure in a serious drama, he would fly into a rage and
strike back when slapped by a guard. This is what it means to "refuse to
bow one’s head even under another’s roof"—a true hero. Yet, there are only
two possible outcomes for him: either he wins the fight and becomes a heroic
figure in a serious drama, but this victory comes at a heavy cost
("defeating the enemy by a thousand means while suffering eight hundred
losses")—he would inevitably get injured. Or he loses the fight: he might
be beaten more severely by the guard, or set upon and assaulted by other
prisoners. Even if he wins the fight temporarily, he could end up being locked
in a solitary confinement cell, or in extreme cases, shot dead by prison
officers on charges of "rebellion"—thus becoming a tragic hero.
Now, let’s look at Wang Sanfeng. He did not
resist immediately; instead, he bided his time until the moment was ripe. With
an ingenious strategy, he achieved his goal, escaped unscathed, and suffered no
harm at all. This is exactly what Wang Sanfeng himself described as
"refusing to bow one’s head under another’s roof, yet never bumping one’s
head either". This is where comedic heroes show greater maturity than
heroic figures in serious dramas and tragic heroes.
Therefore, comedic heroes are truly
"heroes among heroes", the "kings of kings", and the most
heroic of all. Correspondingly, the literature that can create comedic heroes
is the most mature form of literature. This also explains why it is said that
"the emergence of comedic heroes is the hallmark of a country’s literature
reaching true maturity".
Comments
Post a Comment